Educational Fee Setting Strategy Based on Parents’ Economic Capacity (A Study on the Implementation of the ZISWAF Method at SD Islam Sabilul Qur’an)

Authors

  • Yani Mulyani SDN Buahkapas Majalengka
  • Nina Napisah SMP Plus Ar-Rahmat Bandung
  • Wina Sapitri UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Badrudin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Qiqi Yuliati Zakiah UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.2593

Keywords:

differential tuition, Islamic elementary school, educational financing, beneficiary verification, wakaf endowment;

Abstract

This study examines the strategy of SD Islam Sabilul Qur’an Majalengka in setting educational fees according to parents’ economic capacity, the management and use of ZISWAF (Zakat, Infaq, Sedekah, and Wakaf) funds to support school financing, and the challenges and opportunities in implementing a ZISWAF-based funding model at a private Islamic elementary school. A qualitative case study approach was employed, involving in-depth interviews with school administrators, ZISWAF coordinators, teachers, and parents, as well as document review and field observations. Findings indicate that the school categorizes families into “very poor,” “poor,” “lower‐middle,” and “upper‐middle” groups based on income, assets, and dependents. Subsidies range from 50 % to 100 % of full tuition for qualifying families, while higher‐income families pay full fees and may contribute additional infak to bolster the school’s endowment. ZISWAF funds are collected from internal and external donors comprising regular zakat contributions, one‐time sedekah, and wakaf invested as a perpetual fund and are allocated to cover tuition gaps after a verification process involving document checks and home visits. This model has successfully reduced tuition arrears and ensured universal access regardless of socioeconomic status. However, challenges remain in defining clear income thresholds, expediting verification, and mitigating dependency on fluctuating donations. Opportunities include implementing a cloud‐based beneficiary management system, strengthening wakaf endowment management for sustainability, and enhancing parent engagement through regular forums. The study concludes that an integrated ZISWAF‐based financing mechanism can achieve equitable access and financial stability when combined with transparent procedures and community participation.

Keywords: differential tuition, Islamic elementary school, educational financing, beneficiary verification, wakaf endowment;

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968

Adu, J., & Karamah, S. (2023). Analisis distribusi dana zakat, infaq, shadaqah, dan wakaf (ZISWAF) untuk pendidikan: Studi kasus Madrasah Tsanawiyah Y. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 3(1), 112–129.

Asyʽari, M. U. (2021). Integrasi pendidikan karakter Islam melalui kurikulum ekonomi zakat. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(2), 187–202.

Ayu Ashara, H. (2022). Analisis penyaluran dana Zakat, Infaq, Shadaqah, dan Wakaf (ZISWAF) untuk pendidikan pada Lembaga Amil Zakat Al-Washliyah. Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 16(2), 58–75.

Barlas, A. H. (2010). Education as Maqasid al-Shariah: A human development perspective. Islamic Studies Journal, 49(3), 377–398.

Chapra, M. U. (2008). The Islamic vision of development in the light of Maqasid al-Shariah. International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dewi, P., & Indrayani, N. (2021). Persepsi orang tua siswa terhadap biaya pendidikan di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(2), 2464–2473. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i2.3700

Dokumen Kebijakan Tarif SD Islam Sabilul Qur’an. (2023). Kebijakan internal SD Islam Sabilul Qur’an tentang penetapan biaya pendidikan. Arsip Sekolah, Surabaya.

Dokumen Laporan Tahunan ZISWAF SD Islam Sabilul Qur’an. (2024). Laporan tahunan pengelolaan dana ZISWAF di SD Islam Sabilul Qur’an. Arsip Sekolah, Surabaya.

Dokumen Rapat Komite. (2024). Notulen rapat komite sekolah SD Islam Sabilul Qur’an: Pembahasan alokasi ZISWAF dan kriteria penerima. Arsip Sekolah, Surabaya.

Firdayanti Zahro, F., & Widiastuti, T. (2025). Peran dana ZISWAF dalam mengembangkan kualitas pendidikan (studi kasus Griya Khadijah). Jurnal Ekonomi Islam dan Manajemen, 3(1), 112–129.

Firdayanti Zahro, F., & Widiastuti, T. (2025). Peran dana ZISWAF dalam mengembangkan kualitas pendidikan: Studi kasus Griya Khadijah. Jurnal Ekonomi Islam dan Manajemen, 3(1), 112–129.

Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.

Hasan, Z., & Kholid, M. A. (2021). Tantangan penerapan Maqasid al-Shariah pada lembaga pendidikan berbasis wakaf. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Islam, 8(2), 55–71.

Hasbullah, R. (2020). Efektivitas kurikulum ekonomi Islam dalam implementasi subsidi pendidikan berbasis zakat. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah dan Pendidikan, 5(1), 25–38.

Hidayat, R. (2022). Persepsi keadilan orang tua siswa terhadap tarif sekolah swasta di Jakarta. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 9(1), 45–60.

Husaini, H., & Martono, A. (2020). Implementation of ZISWAF in financing education: A case study. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 6(2), 145–158.

Irwan, T. (2019). Sekolah sebagai lembaga mustahik dan muzakki: Telaah peran wakaf produktif. Jurnal Wakaf dan Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 31–48.

Kahf, M. (2003). The role of Zakah and Awqaf in improving the Ummah welfare. Centre for Research on Islamic Banking & Finance (CRIBF).

Kotler, P., & Fox, K. F. A. (2002). Strategic marketing for educational institutions (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.

Laporan Alumni SD Islam Sabilul Qur’an. (2024). Data kelulusan dan kelanjutan pendidikan alumni penerima beasiswa ZISWAF. Arsip Sekolah, Surabaya.

Laporan Keuangan Sekolah SD Islam Sabilul Qur’an. (2024). Laporan keuangan triwulanan dan laporan akhir tahun ajaran 2023/2024. Arsip Sekolah, Surabaya.

Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. (1980). Rules and resources in social exchanges. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (hal. 219–238). Plenum Press.

Maulinda Rahmawati, M., & Yazid, M. (2025). Implementasi ZISWAF dalam pengembangan ekonomi umat melalui prinsip Maqasid Syariah. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Syariah (JIMESHA, 5(1), 41–51.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Munawaroh, I. (2022). Model tarif bertingkat (sliding scale) pada sekolah menengah swasta di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(3), 77–89.

Neuman, W. L. (2020). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (8th ed.). Pearson.

Nugroho, A. F., Nurlaeli, I., & Kaukab, M. E. (2022). ZISWAF dalam implementasi praktis. Manarul Quran: Jurnal Studi Islam, 22(2), 135–159.

Nurlaela, S. (2021). Pengaruh kebijakan tarif tunggal pada segregasi sosial di sekolah swasta. Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan, 4(1), 33–48.

Putri, D., & Andriani, S. (2021). Evaluasi program beasiswa Islam berbasis zakat: Studi di MI Z. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(3), 97–110.

Rahmah, N. (2019). Analisis kebijakan tarif sekolah swasta dalam perspektif keadilan distributif. Jurnal Kebijakan Pendidikan, 4(2), 63–77.

Rahman, M., & Zahid, M. (2021). Good governance dalam manajemen ZISWAF: Implikasi pada sektor pendidikan. Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 15(1), 103–120.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.

Rusydiana, Y., & Santoso, B. (2023). Model pembiayaan pendidikan di pesantren: Implikasi bagi sekolah dasar Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(1), 45–59.

Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sartono, A. (2020). Pertarungan antara efisiensi dan keadilan dalam pengelolaan sekolah swasta. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 110–126.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (ed. ke-19). Alfabeta.

Suryana, E. (2023). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi untuk penetapan tarif sekolah berbasis kemampuan membayar. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(2), 55–68.

UNESCO. (2020). Education for All 2030 Framework for Action. UNESCO Publishing.

Walton, R. E., & Koslowski, S. (2018). Organizational fairness: A managerial perspective. Routledge.

Wright, D. (2015). Sliding scale tuition in Asian non-profit schools: Balancing access and sustainability. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(6), 634–649.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yusuf, A. (2022). Bolehkah zakat digunakan untuk subsidi sekolah menengah menengah? Tinjauan fiqh kontemporer. Jurnal Fiqh dan Wakaf, 1(1), 15–28.

Zulfikar, A. (2024). Peran partisipasi orang tua dalam kebijakan pendidikan inklusif: Studi di SD X. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 88–103.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-03

How to Cite

Mulyani, Y. ., Napisah, N., Sapitri, W. ., Badrudin, & Yuliati Zakiah, Q. . (2025). Educational Fee Setting Strategy Based on Parents’ Economic Capacity (A Study on the Implementation of the ZISWAF Method at SD Islam Sabilul Qur’an). Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 14(3 Agustus), 5815-5826. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.2593