Evaluating a BLUD-Based Teaching Factory in Motorcycle Engineering: A CIPP Study at an Indonesian Vocational High School

Authors

  • A. Jufrizal Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Zainal Arifin Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.5141

Keywords:

BLUD, CIPP evaluation, Teaching Factory, vocational education, work readiness.

Abstract

Teaching Factory programs seek to align vocational learning with authentic industrial work, while Indonesia's Regional Public Service Agency (Badan Layanan Umum Daerah, BLUD) arrangement provides public vocational schools with greater operational and financial flexibility. This study evaluated a BLUD-based Teaching Factory in the Motorcycle Engineering program at SMK Negeri 2 Tanjungpandan using the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) model. The evaluation used descriptive quantitative data collected from December 2025 to March 2026. Role-specific questionnaires were completed by 62 students, seven productive-subject teachers, seven BLUD managers, and five industry representatives (N = 81). Two observers also assessed implementation, and a 40-item document checklist was reviewed. The overall questionnaire mean was 4.23 on a five-point scale (84.60%, very good). Context scored 4.21 (84.20%), Input 4.19 (83.80%), Process 4.24 (84.80%), and Product 4.28 (85.60%). The strongest indicators were occupational safety and standard operating procedure implementation (M = 4.55), industry partnership support (M = 4.39), and perceived impact on learning and students (M = 4.36). The lowest indicators concerned administrative and financial system readiness (M = 4.00), learning management and evaluation (M = 4.04), and service or production quality (M = 4.04). Observation and documentation results were 81.91% and 85.00%, respectively. The program therefore showed strong relevance, implementation, and perceived outcomes, but the cross-sectional, single-site design does not establish causal improvement in work readiness. Priority actions are to modernize facilities, strengthen BLUD administration and monitoring, and add longitudinal graduate and employer outcome measures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ampera, D., Tanjung, N., Farihah, F., Sinukaban, V. Y., & Juliana, N. (2023). Model of teaching factory in vocational high school fashion program students. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 29(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v29i2.65043

Chasovy, A., Jalinus, N., Waskito, W., & Wulansari, R. E. (2024). Analysis of the implementation of the Teaching Factory program in vocational high school. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(7), 4364–4375. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.7569

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dewi, S. S., & Sudira, P. (2018). The contribution of Teaching Factory program implementation on work readiness of vocational high school students in Makassar. Journal of Educational Science and Technology, 4(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v4i2.6434

Diwangkoro, E., & Soenarto, S. (2020). Development of Teaching Factory learning models in vocational schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1456, 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1456/1/012046

Frye, A. W., & Hemmer, P. A. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67. Medical Teacher, 34(5), e288–e299. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637

Hariyanto, W. (2021). Desain implementasi Badan Layanan Umum Daerah pada sekolah menengah kejuruan sebagai penguatan pembelajaran berbasis industri. JAMP: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.17977/um027v4i12021p121

Imran, I., Marji, M., Suswanto, H., & Adhikari, B. P. (2024). The influence of Teaching Factory (TEFA) implementation and work readiness on vocational high school students' future job perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 14(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v14i1.66796

Irfan, A. M., Romadin, A., Putra, I. I., Baharsyah, N. I., & Nawi, M. Z. M. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of the Teaching Factory learning model in leading vocational schools: A case study of agribusiness, food crops, and horticulture programs. Journal of Vocational Education Studies, 7(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.12928/joves.v7i2.10485

Kautsar, A., Wiyono, G., Mulia, M., Iqbal, M., & Al-Fairusy, M. (2022). Teaching Factory model development in vocational high schools. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 6347–6360. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2461

Khoiron, A. M. (2016). The influence of Teaching Factory learning model implementation to the students' occupational readiness. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 23(2), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v23i2.12294

Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. (2018). Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 79 of 2018 concerning Regional Public Service Agencies.

Nouraey, P., Al-Badi, A., Riasati, M. J., & Maata, R. L. (2020). Educational program and curriculum evaluation models: A mini systematic review of the recent trends. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9), 4048–4055. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080930

Prianto, A., Winardi, W., & Qomariyah, U. N. (2021). The effect of the implementation of Teaching Factory and its learning involvement toward work readiness of vocational school graduates. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14117a

Ratnaya, G., Indriaswuri, R., Widayanthi, D. G. C., Atmaja, I. M. P. D., & Dalem, A. A. G. P. K. P. (2022). CIPP evaluation model for vocational education: A critical review. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.03.519

Rosidah, R., & Sutirman, S. (2023). Added value of Teaching Factory learning in services production unit to prepare graduate work readiness. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 42(3), 695–704. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i3.49137

Saputro, I. N., Nurhidayati, A., Suharno, S., Winiawati, C., Yunika, R., & Kusumadevi, M. P. (2023). Evaluation of the Factory implementation of the CIPP method in Indonesian vocational education. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 4972–4982. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.3903

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. Jossey-Bass.

Suharno, S., Pambudi, N. A., & Harjanto, B. (2020). Vocational education in Indonesia: History, development, opportunities, and challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, 115, 105092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105092

Wibawa, E. A., Triyono, M. B., Setiadi, B. R., & Pratama, G. N. I. P. (2023). Empirical study of management of vocational high school with Regional Public Services Agency in Indonesia. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 20, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.6

Yoto, Y., Marsono, M., Qolik, A., & Romadin, A. (2024). Evaluation of Teaching Factory using CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model to improve vocational high school students' skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 14(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v14i1.62573

Downloads

Published

2026-08-29

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 3 Agustus (2026): Didaktika Jurnal Kependidikan

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 A. Jufrizal, Zainal Arifin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Dengan mengirimkan naskah artikel, berarti penulis setuju dengan segala kebijakan yang ditetapkan oleh jurnal dan penerbit.

Penulis menyatakan bahwa:

  • kebijakan ini telah diketahui dan disetujui bersama oleh semua penulis;
  • naskah artikel belum dipublikasikan secara resmi sebelumnya di media ber-ISSN atau ber-ISBN yang terdaftar, kecuali dalam bentuk abstrak atau sebagai bagian dari materi kuliah, atau skripsi/tesis/disertasi yang tidak diterbitkan;
  • naskah tidak sedang dalam proses editorial dan dipertimbangkan untuk publikasi di tempat lain;
  • publikasi naskah ini telah disetujui oleh semua penulis, institusi afiliasi penulis, otoritas yang bertanggung jawab, dan lembaga di mana kegiatan telah dilakukan;
  • naskah berisi materi yang aman dari pelanggaran hak cipta;

Perjanjian Hak Cipta dan Lisensi

  • Penulis memiliki hak cipta dan hak kepemilikan lainnya yang terkait dengan artikel.
  • Penulis memiliki hak dan diizinkan untuk menggunakan substansi artikel untuk karya-karya penulis berikutnya, termasuk untuk keperluan bahan/materi kuliah dan buku.
  • Penulis menyerahkan hak publikasi pertama kepada jurnal dengan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0).

Pernyataan Lisensi CC BY 4.0

Anda diperbolehkan:

  • Berbagi — menyalin dan menyebarluaskan kembali materi ini dalam bentuk atau format apapun;
  • Adaptasi — menggubah, mengubah, dan membuat turunan dari materi ini untuk kepentingan apapun, termasuk kepentingan komersial.

Pemberi lisensi tidak dapat mencabut ketentuan di atas sepanjang Anda mematuhi ketentuan lisensi berikut ini.

  • Atribusi — Anda harus mencantumkan nama yang sesuai, mencantumkan tautan terhadap lisensi, dan menyatakan bahwa telah ada perubahan yang dilakukan. Anda dapat melakukan hal ini dengan cara yang sesuai, namun tidak mengisyaratkan bahwa pemberi lisensi mendukung Anda atau penggunaan Anda.
  • Tidak ada pembatasan tambahan — Anda tidak dapat menggunakan ketentuan hukum atau sarana kontrol teknologi yang secara hukum membatasi orang lain untuk melakukan hal-hal yang diizinkan lisensi ini.

How to Cite

A. Jufrizal, A. J., & Arifin, Z. . (2026). Evaluating a BLUD-Based Teaching Factory in Motorcycle Engineering: A CIPP Study at an Indonesian Vocational High School. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 15(3 Agustus), 4325-4338. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.5141